Protect and Optimize Containerized Apps

Bildschirmfoto 2019 05 29 um 14.06.05

Container platforms such as Kubernetes and RedHat OpenShift combine with agile development methodologies to speed up application development and deployment. By allowing developers to break applications up into smaller components (also known as microservices), containers can help reduce dependencies, allow component-level scaling, and encourage rapid release lifecycles.

However, containerized apps can still be exposed to application-layer vulnerabilities, denial-of-service attacks, and the impacts of client-side network latency. This means they still need app delivery and security services such as web application firewalls, TCP optimization, and protocol gateways.

But a traditional solution with a static configuration changed only by an IT operator conflicts with the agile container paradigm where new microservice containers might be created dynamically for just a few minutes to service a spike in demand or roll out an upgrade by simply replacing old containers with new ones. How do you ensure that your app services deployments keep up with your rapid release cycles in containerized environments?

View whitepaper
Date: 30 August 2019, 0:00 am   |   Provider: F5 Networks   |   Size: 257 KB   |   Language: English
This may interest you too:
Thumb original replacinglegacyavsolutionbrief

Replacing Legacy AV - Benefits of the BlackBerry Cylance Approach

Legacy antivirus solutions are built upon several outmoded technologies ranging from byte-matching to post execution behavioral analysis. Threat actors have adapted to these well-known cybersecurity measures and responded with increasingly sophisticated attacks. For example, using byte-matching to identify malware has been foiled by attackers implementing polymorphic, single-use, and fileless attacks. Post-execution behavioral analysis is too risky of an approach when modern ransomware may encrypt vital data before malicious activity is detecte ...

To the download
Thumb original new edr capes sb d

AI-Driven Threat and Incident Prevention, Detection, and Response

Traditional cybersecurity approaches suffer from two glaring weaknesses. First, they rely on the digital signatures of known malware in order to identify threats. This approach leaves systems vulnerable to new and non-catalogued malware. Second, they are reactive in nature, ascribing to the “it’s not a matter of if, but when” mentality and often responding to the damage caused by zero-day threats only after they execute. Guarding against known threats is important but in the modern threat, landscape organizations must also address the over 350, ...

To the download
Thumb original nextgenantivirusexecutivebrief

Executive Brief: Why It’s Time for Your Organization to Explore Next-Generation Antivirus

In this Paper:

• SMBs face the same security and compliance requirements as enterprises, without the same level of resources.

• Legacy AV has significant shortcomings, including reliance on detect-respond instead of a prevent-first approach to security.

• BlackBerry Cylance is an AI platform that helps small businesses prevent, detect, and respond to threats

...

To the download
Thumb original ai platform of choice wp

Artificial Intelligence: The Platform of Choice

Artificial intelligence (AI) leads the charge in the current wave of digital transformation underway at many global companies. Organizations large and small are actively expanding their AI footprints as executives try to comprehend more fully what AI is and how they can use it to capitalize on business opportunities by gaining insight to the data they collect that enables them to engage with customers and hone a competitive edge. But, while AI may indeed be the frontier of enterprise technology, there remain many misconceptions about it. ...

To the download
Thumb original augmentingendpointsecuritysolutionbrief

Augmenting Endpoint Security with AI-Driven Protection

If an organization’s current cybersecurity solution cannot predict and prevent zero-day attacks, it is living on borrowed time. Polymorphism, fileless attacks, and malware-as-a-service make it increasingly easy to circumvent traditional AV solutions. With the average cost of a data breach reaching $3.86 million, a single compromise can prove catastrophic.

Relying on IT staff, legacy AV, and frequently updated software to stop cyber threats is a costly proposition. Cybersecurity personnel must be hired, trained, and retained in a business cl ...

To the download